There are many reasons you might be motivated to contribute to Mattermost:
If the bug fix that you’re proposing would be larger than 20 lines of code, create a GitHub issue.
If you’ve volunteered to take the ticket once it’s active, or if your fix is too small to warrant the ticket, fork the applicable repository, and start making your changes.
Create a PR on the
master branch of the applicable repository. If there is an associated Jira or GitHub issue, your PR should begin with the issue ID (e.g.
[GH-394]). Our GitHub PR template will walk you through the creation of your PR.
If you’re a community contributor, the team at Mattermost will handle most of the review process for you. You can wait for a reviewer to be assigned and for them to review your work.
Here is an overview of how our review process works listed in the order in which things happen. If you’re a core contributor, you can manage the process yourself.
Labels will be added to your PR, such as
1: UX Review,
2: Dev Review, and
3: QA Review, as applicable. See the list of labels for details.
A milestone or a
cherry-pick label may be added to your PR. Many PRs don’t need this step, and will simply ship once merged. However, if there are upcoming milestones, some reviewers are going to prioritize reviews attached to those milestones. Adding a milestone is mandatory for bug fixes that must be cherry-picked.
In many cases, you’ll know whose code you’re changing and can assign the appropriate Product Manager, Designer, or Technical Writer to review your PR from a UI/UX perspective. When in doubt, somebody is better than nobody, as reviewers can always reassign. Once reviewers approve your PR, the
1: UX Review label will be removed.
Request two core committers to review your PR — one with experience solving that particular type of issue or in that particular language, and another with expertise in the domain of your changes. Don’t request the same people over and over again unless they’re the only people with the necessary expertise. Once they give their approval, the
2: Dev Review label will be removed.
Request a QA tester from the team that owns the code that you’re changing. They’ll decide the necessary scope of testing. Make sure you’ve defined what the expected results are so they know when their tests are successful. Once they give their approval, the
3: QA Review label will be removed. The QA tester may add the
QA Review Done label as well.
Once all outstanding requests are completed, and all involved have approved of the PR, the
4: Reviews Complete label will be added which signals Mattermost core committers to merge the PR into
master, and delete the old branch. If your pull request depends on other pull requests, note this as a PR comment so that the
Do Not Merge/Awaiting PR label can be added to avoid merging prematurely.
If this is a cherry-picked PR, automated processes should handle everything from here on out. If the automated cherry-pick fails, the PR will be cherry-picked manually back to the appropriate releases. If the release branches have not been cut yet, labels are left as-is and the PR is cherry-picked once the branch has been cut. The release manager will provide reminders to finish cherry-picks. The
CherryPick/Done label is applied the end of a cherry-pick process.
Update the appropriate Jira ticket so everybody knows where the project stands. Resolve the ticket for QA from the Ready for QA button, and include QA test steps, or note No Testing Required if no QA testing is needed.
If you need to test your changes on a test server, an appropriate label can be added to the PR. Request this label as a comment in your PR to create a test server. After about three to five minutes, a test server is created, and a bot will send a link and credentials in the form of a comment on the PR. The test server is destroyed when the label is removed.
Once you address suggestions a reviewer has made, re-request a review from them. Their initial review was technically completed, so it’s no longer in a reviewer’s queue until you re-request.
Mattermost has a system to categorize the inactivity of contributions. Invalid PRs don’t need to go through this cycle at the Community Coordinator’s discretion.
After ten days of inactivity: A contribution becomes stale, and a bot will add the
lifecycle/1:stale label to the PR. It’s the job of the Community Coordinator to nudge the right people to get a stale PR active again, even if that means clarifying requests so the contributor has more information to work with.
After 20 days of inactivity: A contribution becomes inactive, and a bot will add the
lifecycle/2:inactive label to the PR.
The Community Coordinator warns everybody involved how much time they have before the contribution is closed and again tries to reach out to the blocking party to help.
The Community Coordinator also ensures that it’s not the reviewers taking the PR to this point — contributions should only ever be inactive because of no response from the contributor.
When contributions are inactive, but there’s a good reason (for example, when the team is actively discussing a major design decision but they haven’t decided on anything yet),
lifecycle/frozen would be a better label.
Inactive contributions are eligible to be picked up by another community member.
After 30 days of inactivity: A contribution becomes orphaned, the
lifecycle/3:orphaned label is added to the now-closed PR. The associated
Help Wanted ticket is given back its
Up For Grabs status so others can pick up the issue.
Good product and developer documentation content is as important as good code! If you notice and fix a content error in the documentation, in a repository README, or in another open source article describing Mattermost, we consider you to be as valued a member of our contributor community as those who contribute to core code.
If you have time to fix the mistake and it only affects a single page, navigate to the applicable page and select Edit in GitHub at the top right. You’ll be walked through the process of creating a fork so that you can then follow the steps under the section titled “You’ve found a bug” in this guide.
If you don’t have time to fix the mistake, copy the file path you’re on, and create a GitHub issue about the problem you found on the applicable repository. Make sure to include the file path and fill out the issue template completely to maximize clarity.
If you’re not up for creating a GitHub issue right now, that’s alright too! In the bottom-right corner of every product documentation page is the question “Did you find what you were looking for?” Use this to quickly provide direct feedback about any page you’re viewing.
If you want to fix a larger problem that affects multiple pages or the structure of the docs, you should first report it as an issue on the appropriate GitHub repository, and follow the steps under “You’ve found a bug”. The developer and product documentation repositories contain instructions on how to build and modify the sites locally so you can test larger changes more efficiently.
Find a list of the Mattermost documentation specific repos on the Contributor expectations page of this guide.
If you’d like to contribute to our blog, website, or social media content, you also have a few options:
You can get paid to write technical content for developers through the Mattermost community writing program.
Share your contributor or user experience! Mention us when you promote your work within our community, and we’ll amplify the message through Mattermost social media platforms.
Want to lead a social community? We can provide advice and resources to help you in the Community channel on the Mattermost Community Server.
Accessibility is one of the most overlooked yet most important features of modern software development, and we’re eager to improve on the accessibility of the features in our open source project and its documentation.
Problems with the accessibility or the inclusivity of both features in the codebase, as well as problems with pieces of content describing Mattermost, are bugs, so we treat them as such in our development process.
When you contribute a change that incorporates an adjustment based on the principles of accessibility and inclusivity, please circle back to this guide to back you up in the PR, ticket, or post.
Thank you for your enthusiasm! You can act on feature ideas in a few ways:
Take a look at our product roadmap. There’s a chance we might already be building the thing you want.
Provide input on features we’re considering to let us know what matters the most to you.
Participate in a survey to help us better understand how to meet the needs of our users.
Discuss your idea with our community in the Feature Proposals channel.
Build an app! Mattermost has a rich framework full of tools to help you add the features you want that don’t quite work as core additions to Mattermost.
Webhooks are the easiest type of app to create and enable you to integrate with the vast majority of modern web tools.
Slash commands are apps that respond to triggers sent as messages inside Mattermost.
More complicated Apps can be built as standard HTTP services in any programming language using a robust API. Get started here.
If you’re willing to deal with more complex development overhead, plugins enable you to alter every component of the Mattermost experience.
We love developers who are passionate about open-source!
If you’re looking to tackle an interesting problem, we’ve got you covered! Feel free to check out the help wanted tickets on GitHub. To take one on, just comment on the issue, and follow the process outlined in You’ve found a bug of this guide. You can find a list of the Mattermost repositories on the Contributor expectations page of this guide.
We’re honored that you’d like to help people use Mattermost in their native language, so we treat all translators as full-fledged contributors alongside engineers and authors.
Each localization community is going to have specific guidelines on how to maintain Mattermost’s distinctive voice across language barriers. Read these guides thoroughly before starting to translate German, French, or Dutch.
To get started:
Each language in whole is assigned one quality level, and with each release cycle, it can be upgraded or downgraded if necessary.
Official — 100% of the language’s translations are verified both by a Mattermost functionality expert and by an expert speaker of the target language. Officially supported languages have at least one official reviewer who updates all of the strings that have changed in the English source text, and they have successfully kept all of the translated strings updated since the last release cycle. The language has been in use for at least three full release cycles.
Beta — At least 90% of the language’s translations are verified by at least one Mattermost functionality expert who is fluent in the target language. If a language is at risk for ongoing maintenance, Mattermost can raise the threshold closer to 100%. Up to 10% of the translations may not be synchronized with the latest English source text.
Alpha — The language does not meet the qualifications for the Beta level.
Every Monday, PRs gets opened for all updates. These PRs will be checked for unexpected character insertions and security problems. Reviewers should always “merge commit” or “rebase and merge” into the PR, but never, ever “squash and commit”. Once approved, PRs are merged into the proper repositories.
Every contribution will be written with the ICU syntax. Please read this guide so you can get familiar with how it works, and focus especially on how plural terms are handled since that topic comes up quite often. See the Mattermost Handbook’s Localization page for best practice recommendations on working with ICU syntax.
Don’t hesitate to use tools like the Online ICU Message Editor, which can help you see how your string will look in context.
If you’re not sure how to translate a technical term, you can search for it elsewhere in your language on the translation server, check how Microsoft has translated it, and feel free to ask for additional string context in the localization channel.
The QA team keeps all contributions up to Mattermost’s high standards. That big responsibility earns QA reviewers the same status as all other contributors.
If you’d like to earn some prizes, join our periodic bug bashes run on the QA Contributors channel on the Mattermost Community Server.
Test-writing is also a valuable part of the development process, and is a great way to start contributing to the Mattermost project.